Dehydrated Skin vs. Dry Skin — Why the Distinction Changes What You Need
The most important diagnostic question in skincare is also the one the category gets most consistently wrong. Dry skin and dehydrated skin are different conditions, caused by different physiological failures, requiring different formulation responses. One is a lipid problem. The other is a water problem. Using a lipid-focused formulation on a water-deficit condition — or a humectant-heavy serum on a lipid-deficient barrier — does not make skin better. It substitutes one approach for the problem that actually needs solving.
The confusion is understandable. Both conditions produce tightness, discomfort, and a tendency to reach for richer moisturisers. But the underlying physiological mechanisms are distinct enough that correctly identifying which one you are dealing with — or whether both are present at once — is the prerequisite for a rational response. This article provides that diagnostic framework.
The Distinction, Explained
Dry skin is a structural deficit in the stratum corneum's lipid matrix. Dehydrated skin is a functional deficit in the corneocyte's water-holding capacity. The conditions can coexist but are physiologically independent.
If you have used thicker creams year after year and still wake up to skin that feels tight by mid-morning — you may be treating a water problem with a lipid solution. That is not a product failure. It is a classification error. The distinction between dry and dehydrated is not subtle, but it is rarely taught clearly.
The skin's outermost functional layer — the stratum corneum — has two distinct jobs that are regulated by two distinct systems. The first is controlling water loss through the skin's surface: this is managed by the intercellular lipid matrix, a structured arrangement of ceramides, cholesterol, and free fatty acids that surrounds each corneocyte and creates the physical permeability barrier. The second is maintaining water inside the corneocytes themselves: this is managed by natural moisturising factor (NMF), a collection of hygroscopic small molecules generated inside corneocytes from the breakdown of a protein called filaggrin.
Dry skin is what happens when the first system fails — when lipid content in the intercellular matrix falls below the threshold needed to regulate transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Dehydrated skin is what happens when the second system fails — when NMF is depleted and corneocytes lose their capacity to hold water at the cellular level.
Ceramides account for approximately 50% of total stratum corneum lipid mass by weight. When ceramide content falls — due to ageing, repeated surfactant exposure, retinoid use, or genetic factors — the lamellar bilayer organisation that constitutes the physical permeability barrier becomes disordered. TEWL rises regardless of how much water is attracted to the surface, because the physical structure that retains it is compromised (Elias, Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 1997; Ceramide physiology and skin barrier, PMC 9440333). NMF, by contrast, is an intracorneocyte phenomenon — it constitutes approximately 10% of corneocyte mass and functions as the cell's hygroscopic reservoir. Its depletion is driven by UV exposure, surfactant stripping, and low-humidity environments, and it impairs the corneocyte's ability to attract and hold water independently of what the lipid matrix is doing (Rawlings and Harding, Dermatologic Therapy, 2004).
Because both conditions produce tightness and discomfort, they are routinely conflated — by consumers, by beauty content, and often by product positioning. The practical consequence of conflating them is that the formulation strategy for each is different, and using the wrong one addresses only part of the problem, or the wrong part entirely.
What Dry Skin Actually Is
Dry skin is primarily a structural condition — a deficit in the lipid matrix that forms the skin's permeability barrier. It tends to be persistent and often has a genetic or physiological basis.
A condition of insufficient or disordered lipid content in the stratum corneum's intercellular matrix. The principal lipids — ceramides, cholesterol, and free fatty acids — are reduced or structurally disorganised, impairing the skin's capacity to regulate transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Dry skin is typically a persistent skin type rather than a transient condition state. It is characterised by reduced sebaceous output, visible scaling, surface roughness, and a predisposition to irritation and sensitivity.
In clinical terms, dry skin — xerosis — is fundamentally a lipid problem. The stratum corneum's intercellular lipid matrix is composed of approximately 50% ceramides, 25% cholesterol, and 15% free fatty acids, arranged in a precise lamellar (layered) architecture. This architecture is the physical structure through which water vapour must travel to exit the skin. When the lipids are insufficient or structurally disordered, the path becomes shorter, less tortuous, and water leaves the skin faster. This is the mechanism of elevated TEWL (Elias, Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 1997).
Dry skin as a skin type is often genetic in origin. Variants in the filaggrin gene — which encodes a structural protein involved in both corneocyte formation and NMF generation — are associated with reduced ceramide content and impaired barrier function. Ageing independently reduces ceramide synthesis. Chronic surfactant exposure strips lamellar lipids from the stratum corneum and disrupts the acid mantle that regulates the enzymes responsible for normal lipid processing. Retinoid and high-concentration exfoliant use can transiently compromise the barrier by accelerating corneocyte turnover faster than the skin's lamellar body secretion can compensate.
The physical presentation of dry skin is characterised by visible roughness, surface flaking, and a matte surface texture that does not shift substantially through the day. The skin may crack or fissure under mechanical stress. Itching is common. Sensitivity to topical products — particularly those with preserved or formulated actives — is elevated because the compromised barrier allows deeper penetration of potential irritants. Dry skin in its clinical sense tends to be persistent: it does not resolve when a person drinks more water, changes humidity, or increases moisturiser application frequency.
What Dry Skin Needs From a Formulation
Because dry skin is a lipid deficit condition, the appropriate formulation response is lipid supplementation: ceramides (to replenish the principal lamellar lipid), cholesterol and fatty acids (to maintain the 1:1:1 lipid molar ratio needed for optimal lamellar organisation), and occlusives (to physically reduce TEWL while the endogenous lipid repair mechanism operates over its 24–72 hour window). A humectant-only approach — high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid in a water vehicle — will produce a temporary increase in surface hydration but will not address the underlying structural deficit. The water attracted by the humectant will evaporate through the same compromised barrier that caused the dryness, and the benefit will be short-lived.
"A humectant attracts water. It does not build the structure that keeps it. In dry skin — where the structure is what has failed — humectancy without lipid reinforcement is a temporary measure, not a solution."
What Dehydrated Skin Actually Is
Dehydrated skin is a water-deficit condition inside the corneocytes — driven by NMF depletion, not lipid loss. It can affect any skin type, appears without flaking, and is strongly linked to environmental and behavioural stressors.
A condition in which corneocytes are deficient in water due to insufficient natural moisturising factor (NMF) or elevated transepidermal water loss (TEWL), or both. Dehydrated skin is not a skin type — it is a condition state that can occur in oily, combination, and dry skin alike. Its characteristic signs are tightness, surface dullness, and fine lines that accentuate through the day. It does not reliably present with flaking or roughness. It is strongly associated with environmental exposures: UV, hard water, low-humidity environments, and repeated cleansing (Rawlings and Harding, Dermatologic Therapy, 2004).
Natural moisturising factor is generated inside the corneocyte as it matures. As keratinocytes in the lower epidermis differentiate and move upward, filaggrin — a structural protein — is progressively broken down by enzymatic processes into its amino acid components. These free amino acids (principally serine, arginine, and glutamic acid derivatives), along with pyrrolidone carboxylic acid (PCA), urocanic acid, lactate, urea, and small sugars, constitute NMF. The mixture is intensely hygroscopic: it can attract and hold atmospheric water at relative humidities as low as 50% (Rawlings and Harding, 2004; Filaggrin and NMF, PMC 2721001).
When NMF is adequate, the corneocyte acts as a self-replenishing water reservoir — drawing moisture from the atmosphere and maintaining internal hydration even between product applications. When NMF is depleted, the reservoir empties, and the corneocyte becomes rigid, less flexible, and unable to maintain the hydration that normal enzymatic function in the stratum corneum depends on. Desquamatory enzymes — the serine proteases responsible for the normal shedding of corneocytes — require water to function. When corneocyte hydration falls, these enzymes become less active, cornified cells accumulate, and the surface becomes dull and rough without the classical flaking pattern of true dry skin.
NMF is depleted by the same stressors that are the daily background of urban Indian life: UV exposure reduces filaggrin expression; surfactant-based cleansers strip the outer NMF-rich corneocyte layers; low-humidity air conditioning environments inhibit the enzymatic processing of filaggrin into NMF, because the conversion requires a minimum level of SC water activity. In this way, the environment itself can sustain chronic NMF depletion independently of how many products are applied.
A self-reinforcing cycle connects NMF depletion to continued dehydration. When SC water content falls below the threshold needed for normal enzymatic activity, filaggrin processing is impaired — reducing the rate at which new NMF is generated in maturing corneocytes. This means that low SC hydration → impaired filaggrin → reduced NMF → lower SC hydration. The cycle operates independently of lipid status, though it is worsened when lipid barrier function is also compromised, because elevated TEWL accelerates the water loss that initiates the cycle (Filaggrin, NMF synthesis, and SC hydration, PMC 2721001).
How to Tell Them Apart
The key diagnostic signals lie in texture, pattern over the day, and how the skin responds to different product types — not in how much oil is visible at the surface.
The surface presentation of dry and dehydrated skin overlaps enough to cause consistent misidentification, but the pattern of symptoms over time and across conditions is different. The following signals are the most diagnostically useful.
Signs That Point to Dehydrated Skin
Tightness that worsens through the day, particularly in air-conditioned environments. Fine lines that are visibly accentuated by mid-afternoon — not because new lines have formed, but because dehydrated corneocytes do not flex normally and create a creased surface appearance. A dull, flat quality to the skin's surface, without the light-scatter that well-hydrated, smooth corneocytes produce. Skin that drinks in a humectant serum immediately and feels better within minutes but returns to discomfort within two to three hours. Texture that is not noticeably rough or flaking but that looks and feels flat. Oily skin types who describe their skin as simultaneously congested and uncomfortable, tight, or dull — this presentation is almost always dehydration (see Section 5 on oily-and-dehydrated).
Signs That Point to Dry Skin
Visible surface texture: roughness that can be felt by touch, flaking or scaling, areas of cracking or fissuring especially around the nose, mouth, or knuckles. Low sebaceous output — the skin does not produce a visible shine even many hours after washing. A persistent, stable quality to the discomfort rather than one that fluctuates based on environment or product use. Irritation and sensitivity to many product categories — the compromised lipid barrier allows ingredients that would not normally penetrate to reach the viable epidermis. Dry skin in the classical sense tends to present more consistently across seasons, though it worsens in low-humidity conditions.
| Dehydrated Skin | Dry Skin | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary physiological failure | NMF depletion; elevated TEWL (water problem) | Lamellar lipid deficit in stratum corneum (lipid problem) |
| Who it affects | Any skin type — including oily skin | Typically a persistent skin type; often genetic component |
| Surface texture | Dull, flat; not reliably rough or flaking | Visibly rough, scaling, may flake or crack |
| Fine lines | Accentuated through the day; improve with hydration | May be present but tend to be consistent rather than variable |
| Pattern through the day | Worsens in AC or low-humidity; fluctuates with environment | Consistent; may worsen in dry seasons but not markedly variable |
| Response to humectant serum | Immediate short-term relief; comfort returns then fades | Partial relief; texture does not fundamentally improve |
| Sebum production | Can be oily, combination, or dry | Typically low sebaceous output |
| Formulation requirement | NMF-supportive humectants + barrier lipids + film-forming retention | Lipid replacement: ceramides, fatty acids, occlusives |
When Both Are Present
The two conditions coexist more often than they occur in isolation in the Terra target population — specifically in urban Indian skin that is simultaneously subjected to surfactant stripping (which depletes both NMF and lamellar lipids), AC-driven low humidity (which impairs NMF replenishment), and the cumulative effect of active ingredient use (which accelerates corneocyte turnover and lamellar disruption). When both are present, the skin presents with elements of each: some flaking or roughness alongside persistent tightness; a compromised barrier that cannot retain even the water attracted by humectant ingredients. The formulation response must address both simultaneously — NMF-supportive humectancy for the water-deficit component, and lipid supplementation for the structural component.
Oily and Dehydrated at the Same Time
Sebum production and corneocyte water content are regulated by independent biological systems. Oily skin does not mean hydrated skin. The oily-and-dehydrated paradox is one of the most practically consequential misclassifications in Indian skincare.
A significant portion of the people who reach us describe their skin as oily and yet chronically uncomfortable — tight after washing, dull by mid-afternoon, never quite right despite a consistently applied routine. The category has no language for this. Most of what they've been sold is designed around reducing oil rather than addressing the water deficit underneath it. Dehydrated oily skin is not a niche presentation. For Indian skin dealing with AC environments and hard water and surfactant-heavy cleansers, it's one of the most common skin states I see described. The diagnostic confusion — and the wrong products it leads to — is the thing I wanted Terra to specifically address.
The conventional dry–oily–combination classification describes sebaceous gland output: how much sebum the skin produces. Sebum is composed primarily of squalene, wax esters, triglycerides, and cholesterol esters. It sits on the skin's surface and within the follicular canal. It does not substantially contribute to the water content of the stratum corneum. The permeability barrier — the structure that determines how much water is lost through the skin's surface — is constituted by the intercellular lamellar lipid matrix between corneocytes, which is an epidermal product entirely separate from the sebaceous system.
What this means physiologically is that a person can produce abundant sebum — visible shine, congested pores, the full oily skin phenotype — and simultaneously have depleted NMF and elevated TEWL. The sebum does not compensate for NMF deficiency. The two parameters are regulated by different biological systems and do not reliably reflect each other. Indian skin phototypes show higher baseline TEWL values than Caucasian skin despite comparable or higher hydration at baseline, suggesting a lamellar barrier architecture that is less efficient at preventing water loss — a finding consistent with populations experiencing high UV load, hard water, and active-heavy routines (TEWL and Indian skin phenotype, Cosmed Media, 2024).
In barrier-compromised skin with elevated TEWL, the epidermis detects water loss and upregulates sebum production as a compensatory mechanism — the skin attempts to create a surface lipid film to slow water loss. The result is a presentation that reads as oily at the surface while being simultaneously dehydrated at the cellular level. This combination creates a common diagnostic and therapeutic mismatch: the visible oil triggers the selection of oil-control or mattifying products, which strip the surface further, worsen TEWL, and increase the underlying dehydration — prompting more sebum production. The cycle is self-reinforcing.
Sebum is produced by sebaceous glands attached to hair follicles. Its regulation is governed by androgens, diet, and genetic factors. The stratum corneum's water content is governed by lamellar lipid integrity, NMF levels, TEWL rate, and ambient humidity. Neither system has a direct regulatory connection to the other. In skin where TEWL is chronically elevated — due to barrier compromise, NMF depletion, or both — sebum production may be upregulated as a secondary compensatory response via osmosensing mechanisms in the stratum granulosum. This upregulation increases surface oil without addressing the underlying water deficit (Sebum and SC permeability independence, ScienceDirect; Elias barrier physiology, UCSF research group).
The correct formulation response for oily-and-dehydrated skin is not an oil-control serum. It is a barrier-appropriate formulation that addresses the water deficit — NMF-supportive humectants, lipid reinforcement to reduce TEWL, and a film-forming component to extend hydration residence time — in a texture light enough not to add to the sebaceous load or occlude follicles. This is a different design brief from either a rich emollient cream for dry skin or a glass-skin serum optimised for optical luminosity.
Why the Distinction Changes What You Need
Each condition maps to a different formulation requirement. The mechanisms are different, the deficits are different, and the ingredients that address them are different. Using the right product for the wrong condition is not a failure of efficacy — it is a failure of classification.
The formulation requirements for dry skin and dehydrated skin overlap in some areas and diverge in others. The overlap is in the need for lipid reinforcement — both conditions benefit from ceramides, fatty acids, and an emulsion architecture that supports the lamellar barrier. The divergence is in the humectancy and retention strategy.
What Dry Skin Needs
Lipid replacement is the primary requirement: exogenous ceramides to replenish the intercellular lamellar matrix; cholesterol and free fatty acids to maintain the three-component lipid ratio needed for proper lamellar organisation; and an emulsion vehicle that supports lamellar integration of these components rather than simply depositing them at the surface. A ceramide-dominant emulsion — structured to deliver lipids in a form that can intercalate into the SC's existing lamellar architecture — is meaningfully different from a product that simply lists ceramide in its ingredient declaration without attending to the delivery system. Occlusives (butters, waxes, moderate-density lipid films) reduce the TEWL that would otherwise continue to deplete the SC even while lipid repair proceeds.
What Dehydrated Skin Needs
The formulation requirement for dehydrated skin begins with NMF-supportive humectancy: small-molecule humectants that mimic or replenish the water-binding function of NMF's component molecules — glycerin (which operates via aquaporin-3, the water channel most expressed in the epidermis), betaine and proline (which function as compatible solutes that stabilise corneocyte proteins under osmotic stress), and free amino acids that restore the hygroscopic small-molecule pool depleted by cleansing and UV. These are not interchangeable with a single large-molecule humectant — high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid sits on the SC surface and does not address intracorneocyte water deficit.
The second requirement is water retention: a film-forming component that physically traps the water attracted by humectants, preventing evaporation in the low-humidity AC environments where the humectant paradox — where humectants may draw water from the dermis rather than the atmosphere — is most active. Protein and polysaccharide film formers create a surface-resident layer that extends hydration residence time beyond the immediate post-application period. Without this, the hydration benefit is real but brief.
The third requirement is barrier lipid reinforcement: even when the primary problem is water deficit rather than lipid deficit, reducing TEWL through lamellar lipid support prevents the water loss that perpetuates the NMF depletion cycle. This is not the same dosage of lipid replacement needed for classical dry skin — it is lipid support sufficient to reduce the TEWL rate and prevent the SC water loss that impairs NMF replenishment.
The formulation consequence of this distinction is real. When I was building Terra, the design question was not "how do I hydrate skin" — it was "how do I address the specific failure mode in skin that is chronically dehydrated but not classically dry." That meant building a multi-pathway humectant system — glycerin, betaine, sodium polyglutamate crosspolymer, free amino acids — because each of those operates through a different mechanism at the corneocyte level. A single humectant at high concentration does not do the same thing as several humectants working through distinct pathways. Then putting a film-forming system over it to prevent the water from leaving before it has a chance to be retained. Then adding lamellar lipids in a vehicle architecture designed to support their integration into the barrier. Three separate problems, three separate components, working sequentially. That is the formulation logic. It is not complicated once you understand the physiology. But the physiology is where most product development in this category never starts.
Formulation Context: Terra
Terra is designed for the dehydrated-and-barrier-compromised skin phenotype: skin that needs water-holding support at the corneocyte level, a film-forming layer that prevents evaporation in low-humidity environments, and lamellar lipid reinforcement to reduce the TEWL that perpetuates NMF depletion. It addresses dry and dehydrated as co-occurring conditions — which is the more common clinical presentation in urban Indian skin — rather than treating each in isolation. Terra is not a ceramide serum. Ceramides are one component of a multi-system architecture. The distinction this page has described — water problem versus lipid problem — is built into the formulation: multiple NMF-supportive humectants for the water system, ceramide NP and a multi-source lipid blend for the structural system, hydrolysed proteins and polysaccharides for the retention layer.
- NMF-supportive humectancyGlycerin, betaine, sodium polyglutamate crosspolymer, free amino acids — multiple mechanisms addressing the intracorneocyte water-holding deficit
- Lamellar lipid supportCeramide NP, hydrogenated lecithin, multi-source plant oils — addressing the structural lipid deficit and reducing TEWL
- Film-forming retention layerHydrolysed wheat and soy proteins, Chondrus crispus extract — physically extending hydration residence time in low-humidity environments
- Delivery vehicle architectureLamellar liquid-crystalline emulsion via cetearyl glucoside and hydrogenated lecithin — designed to support lamellar lipid integration rather than surface deposition
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you have both dry and dehydrated skin at the same time?
Yes — and in the urban Indian population, this co-presentation is common. Dry skin reflects a structural lipid deficit in the stratum corneum; dehydrated skin reflects a water-holding deficit inside the corneocytes. The conditions are physiologically independent, but the same environmental stressors — surfactant cleansing, hard water, UV exposure, active-ingredient use — deplete both NMF and lamellar lipids simultaneously. When both are present, the formulation response needs to address both: lipid supplementation for the structural component and NMF-supportive humectancy with film-forming retention for the water component.
If my skin is oily, can it still be dehydrated?
Yes. Sebum production and corneocyte water content are regulated by completely separate biological systems. Sebum is produced by the sebaceous glands in response to androgenic and dietary signals; the stratum corneum's water-holding capacity is governed by NMF levels and lamellar lipid integrity. An individual with high sebum output can simultaneously have severely depleted NMF — particularly if they use oil-control cleansers and live in air-conditioned environments. The oily surface appearance does not indicate that the skin is adequately hydrated at the cellular level.
How do I know if my skin tightness is from dehydration or a damaged barrier?
Dehydrated skin and a damaged barrier can produce similar sensations, but their patterns differ. Dehydration-driven tightness tends to fluctuate with environment — worse in AC, better after hydrating products, worsening again after a few hours. A damaged barrier often comes with stinging, burning, or sensitivity to products that the skin previously tolerated, redness, and discomfort that persists regardless of what is applied. Barrier damage and dehydration frequently coexist — a compromised barrier accelerates the TEWL that drives NMF depletion. Addressing only one without the other will produce incomplete relief.
Does drinking more water fix dehydrated skin?
Adequate systemic hydration is a baseline requirement for overall health, but it does not reliably translate into improved stratum corneum hydration in individuals with a compromised barrier or depleted NMF. The mechanism by which water reaches the stratum corneum is passive diffusion from the deeper dermis — a process regulated by the same gradient that drives TEWL. In skin with a functional barrier, this diffusion maintains SC water content adequately. In skin with elevated TEWL, the water diffuses upward and evaporates faster than additional systemic water can replenish it. The problem is structural — in the barrier's capacity to retain water — not volumetric.
Why do I still feel tight after applying a hydrating serum?
The most common reason is the absence of a retention layer. Many hydrating serums are built around large-molecule humectants — high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid — in a lightweight aqueous vehicle with no film-forming polymer and no lipid occlusion. These serums attract water to the skin surface effectively, but in low-humidity environments (AC interiors typically run at 30–45% relative humidity), that water evaporates quickly. The benefit is real but brief. A formulation that includes both humectants and a film-forming component — proteins, polysaccharides, or a lamellar lipid layer — creates a physical barrier that extends hydration residence time beyond the immediate post-application period.
Is dehydrated skin the same as a damaged skin barrier?
No — though the conditions are closely linked. A damaged barrier refers specifically to a compromised stratum corneum lipid matrix that cannot adequately regulate TEWL, allowing irritants in and water out. Dehydrated skin refers specifically to insufficient water-holding capacity inside the corneocytes, driven by NMF depletion. A damaged barrier will worsen dehydration because elevated TEWL accelerates NMF depletion. But dehydration can occur without classical barrier damage — and dehydration that persists long enough will eventually compromise barrier function, because the enzymatic processes involved in normal lamellar lipid synthesis require adequate SC hydration to operate.
- Rawlings, A.V., and Harding, C.R. "Moisturization and skin barrier function." Dermatologic Therapy, Vol. 17, Suppl 1, 2004, pp. 43–48. Available at: PubMed 14728698.
- Elias, P.M. "Stratum corneum defensive functions: an integrated view." Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Vol. 125, No. 2, 2005, pp. 183–200. Foundational barrier lipid model; ceramide:cholesterol:FFA triad and lamellar architecture. Available at: PubMed 9308554.
- Sandilands, A., Sutherland, C., Irvine, A.D., and McLean, W.H.I. "Filaggrin in the frontline: role in skin barrier function and disease." Journal of Cell Science, Vol. 122, No. 9, 2009, pp. 1285–1294. Available at: PMC 2721001.
- Mao-Qiang, M., Elias, P.M., and Feingold, K.R. "Fatty acids are required for epidermal permeability barrier function." Journal of Clinical Investigation, Vol. 92, No. 2, 1993, pp. 791–798. Ceramide physiology and skin barrier lipid requirements. Available at: PMC 9440333.
- Fluhr, J.W., Darlenski, R., and Berardesca, E. "Transepidermal water loss, and the science of skin occlusion." Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, 2008; and measurement methodology, PMC 4522909. Available at: PMC 4522909.
- Björklund, S., Engblom, J., Thuresson, K., and Sparr, E. "A water gradient can be used to regulate drug transport across skin." Journal of Controlled Release, Vol. 158, No. 3, 2012. Water activity and humectant behaviour at varying RH. Available at: PubMed 24786192.
- Cosmed Media. "Who has the driest skin? Ethnic characteristics of facial skin hydration." Industry review, 2024. TEWL and Indian skin phototype data. Available at: cosmedmedia.com.
- Danby, S.G., et al. "Effect of water hardness on surfactant deposition after washing and subsequent skin irritation in atopic dermatitis patients and healthy control subjects." Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Vol. 138, No. 1, 2018. Hard water, FLG mutations, and TEWL. Available at: PubMed 28927888.